You can’t charge people to sit in the audience and charge people to sit on the stage at the same time and make them all happy.
One of the reasons that I believe the 140 Conference is so exceptional is that Jeff has a belief that you can’t charge people to sit in the audience and then charge people to sit on the stage at the same time. That is the way that most conferences are run today. The people in the audience pay to attend and most of the speakers are sponsors who have paid for the privilege to speak to the audience. This results in speakers who are often not very inspired, or particularly knowledgeable about the subject. And they are often there to sell the audience their products or services so the speeches are a little bit about the subject, and a lot about sales. This type of compromise leads to poor conferences where everyone is looking for the WIIFM (what’s in it for me) and coming up empty.
But at the 140 Conference things are different because the speakers are people with something interesting to say, and not just a few of them, but every one of them. For this reason the conference is uniquely exciting and engaging. But don’t just take my word for it read a few of these posts by other bloggers. Therefore I am proud that Jeff has asked me to be a part of making this event a success. If your company or someone you know is interested in becoming a sponsor for the April 140 Conference in New York, please contact me Chris@140conf.com or via this blog post. Give me 1 good reason why I won’t be seeing you at the next 140 Conference?




3 responses so far ↓
1 Jason // Feb 10, 2010 at 6:12 am
Hi Chris – Thought provoking as always. Tx.
But as a conference marketer, I believe there is some balance to be had in the sponsor/speaker debate.
The sponsors/vendors in any market are essential, they often drive the innovation in any industry, particularly in the internet age. Also without sponsors, many events would not exist.
That said, no one likes attending a conference and being pitched, so the it’s up to organizers and sponsors to ensure they are adding value.
I also added some more interesting information in my blog post response.
http://nomadmarketer.wordpress.com/2010/02/10/the-balance-are-events-an-effective-b2b-marketing-channel/
Thanks Chris, as I said thought provoking as always! keep it up!
2 Chris Kieff // Feb 10, 2010 at 9:50 am
Jason,
Thanks for your comments and your thoughtful article. I feel that there is an inherent conflict of interest when charging for speaking rights and audience rights simultaneously. Therefore when push comes to shove the best interests of the promoter not the audience will be served. This practice will ultimately undermine the quality of the event and kill it.
I believe that is what leads to the demise of so many promising events. It’s not the changes in the industry, or the cycles of the economy. It’s the gradual decline of the quality of the show caused by pressure from sponsors.
Chris
3 Justin Moore-Brown // Feb 26, 2010 at 12:00 pm
Hey Chris,
Your thoughts are spot on when it comes to quality events. I’ve been turned off by many conferences and networking events because of the WIFM effect of people trying to recoup any costs (some significant) in attending events.
I attended the 140conf LA and it was a fantastic experience shared by hundreds of people over the 2 days it took place.
Thanks for the great post and the link back!
Leave a Comment